Not wrong in the sense of illegal. Wrong in the sense that mattered less to the people who wrote it. An ingredient list that named the right compounds, at doses too small to have ever been tested on anyone. A 'clinically studied' claim resting on a study that used four times the amount actually in the jar.
This isn't rare. It's the default. Most supplements are formulated by a marketing brief, then dosed to hit a price point — not the other way around.
PONS was built by people who read the studies for a living: a physician and a pharmaceutical chemist, working from the same standard they'd apply to anything meant to go in a body. If a dose in a published trial produced a measured effect, that's the dose we use. If it didn't, the ingredient doesn't make the cut — no matter how well it photographs on a label.
